Primary and Community Care

Introduction

Xerostomia, also known as dry mouth, is prevalent in older populations and associated with key determinants such as continual use of medication, radiation, and chronic diseases. Xerostomia significantly increases the risk of experiencing demineralisation, dental caries, tooth sensitivity, candidiasis, and other oral conditions that may negatively affect quality of life. An effective strategy to manage the risk of dental caries for patients with xerostomia is the prescription of high-fluoride products with proven efficacy. The aim of this study was to provide evidence on the burden of xerostomia, patient characteristics, treatments, and healthcare resource use in this patient population in the United Kingdom.

Method

A retrospective observational study was conducted including all patients aged ≥16 years with a first diagnosis of xerostomia between 01/04/2015-31/03/2020 in the Optimum Patient Care Research Database, a primary care database. Patients with <12 months’ baseline and follow-up data were excluded.

Results

11,731 patients with a mean age of 67.93 years (SD 15.64) newly diagnosed with xerostomia were included. 72.27% of patients were >60 years and 65.3% were females. Patients aged ≥65 years received a median of 5 (Q1-Q3: 4-6) drug classes in the baseline period. Analgesic agents (80.6%), cardiovascular drugs (70.3%), antidepressants and antipsychotic agents (57.3%), and antihypertensive agents (47.6%) were common prescriptions reported before the diagnosis of xerostomia. Patients had 24.2 primary care visits with the associated costs of £727.66 per patient-year during follow-up. Only 2.2% of patients received high-fluoride toothpaste, whereas 99.6% of patients were prescribed artificial saliva and 16.3% received saliva stimulants.

Conclusions

The majority of patients aged ≥65 years had chronic diseases for which they received ≥4 medications in the baseline period. Although xerostomia is predominantly managed in primary care, few patients are prescribed high-fluoride toothpaste, which is a cost-effective and simple way to reduce the inevitable risk of dental caries.

Introduction:

Recording dementia diagnoses is essential to ensure appropriate post-diagnostic support and care. We examined the prevalence of recorded dementia in different routine datasets and associations with emergency hospitalisation and mortality.

Methods:

This retrospective longitudinal cohort study included all adults ≥65 years registered with a Southeast Scotland GP on 1st April 2016. Dementia diagnoses were identified in primary care, hospital discharge and community prescribing records. New diagnoses were considered from 1st April 2016 to 1st April 2020. All individuals were followed up to 23rd October 2023. Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray models were used to estimate associations between recorded dementia and death and emergency hospitalisation, respectively. Diagnosis capture in other datasets was examined, accounting for mortality.

Results:

On 1st April 2016, 7544/133407 (5.7%) individuals had a recorded dementia diagnosis: 1254 (16.6%) in a single dataset, including 940 (12.5%) only in primary care and 279 (3.7%) in hospital data. Between 1st April 2016 to 1st April 2020, 7359/133,407 (5.8%) had a new diagnosis: 5165 (70.2%) first recorded in primary care, 1634 (22.2%)in hospital and 560 (7.6%)in community prescribing data. People with dementia had higher risks of death [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.46 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.39-2.54)] and emergency hospitalisation [adjusted subdistribution HR 1.58 (95%CI 1.56-1.60)] then those without dementia. People with diagnoses first recorded in hospital had higher mortality rates than those with community diagnoses [<30days: aHR 8.96 (95%CI 6.94-13.52); >365days: aHR 1.29 (95%CI 1.19-1.41)]. Only 562 (35.9%) of those with hospital diagnoses had recorded primary care diagnoses within a year.

Conclusions:

Dementia is often recorded in single datasets, sometimes only in hospital data. Dementia is associated with adverse prognosis, with highest mortality in those first diagnosed in hospital. Findings highlight the need for better recording, dataset integration and scrutiny of hospital-based diagnostic pathways to ensure appropriate post-diagnostic support and care.

Background

Dementia is a prevalent condition in an ageing population. Persons with dementia and their caregivers are often uncertain about what to expect after an initial diagnosis. Previous studies conducted on the experiences of informal caregivers show a clear demand to address these: providing adequate information, psychosocial support and access to services.

Introduction

The diagnosis of dementia is usually made by specialists in the tertiary hospital. However, resources in acute tertiary hospitals are expensive and valuable. To better allocate resources and improve the manpower situation, we have collaborated with our community partner to provide post diagnosis support (PDS) to patients newly diagnosed with dementia.

Methods

A PDS team consisting of an allied health professional and a caregiver peer is established by our community partner. They conduct home visits to provide psychoeducation to help persons with dementia and their caregivers understand more about dementia, develop personalised care plans, and coordinate support services to provide psychoemotional support.

Close communication is maintained between the PDS team and the acute hospital referral team. Multidisciplinary team meetings involving the geriatricians, nurses, case managers and community partners are also held quarterly to provide regular updates about the progress of the patients and facilitate learning.

Results

A total of 95 persons who were newly diagnosed with dementia in the previous 1.5 years were referred. 53 patients were eventually enrolled under the PDS programme, and received psychoeducation and personalised care plans. 72% were given caregiver support and 66% were linked up to community services. The average duration between date of referral to date of first home visit is 13 days.

Conclusions

In an ageing population where there is high healthcare utilisation, it is efficient to utilise existing services instead of duplicating them. By collaborating with community partners, we are empowering them to play a better role in supporting persons with dementia.

Introduction

Global estimates indicate over half of individuals aged 85 and older are frail (1), costing the UK healthcare system approximately £5.8 billion annually(2). Locally, over 6,500 patients aged 65+ are admitted to West Middlesex University Hospital (WMUH) every six months. The proposed frailty team aims to implement early comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) through a multidisciplinary approach. Timely CGAs can increase the likelihood of patients remaining in their own homes at 6 and 12 months(3), reduce length of stay (LoS), and lower healthcare costs, contingent upon available community infrastructure. WMUH serves multiple boroughs, necessitating coordination with various community services to support discharges. These services include Hospital at Home and Integrated Care Response Services.

Objective

To gather baseline data on frail patients admitted before the introduction of a 'Front Door Frailty' team.

Methods

Data were collected for all medical admissions to WMUH from 1st to 14th July 2022, including:

• Patients aged ≥65 years

• Numbers with a frailty syndrome

• Clinical Frailty Score (CFS)

• Admissions in the previous year

• Length of stay

• Mortality at 5, 9, and 12 months

Results

From 459 admissions over 2 weeks, 278 patients (61%) were ≥65 years old. Among these patients:

• 54% had a CFS ≥ 6

• 44% presented with a frailty syndrome

• 83%, 72%, and 67% were alive at 5, 9, and 12 months respectively

• Mean LoS was 11.0 days

• 37% had ≥1 admission in the following 6 months

• Of those with a CFS ≥ 6, 63% had ≥1 admission in the previous year

Conclusions

A high percentage of acute admissions at our hospital are characterised by frailty. Through early identification, multidisciplinary management, and improved links with local community services, the new acute frailty team aims to decrease length of stay and improve patient experience.

Background

This clinical improvement project took place at a community frailty clinic. The primary and secondary care collaboration clinic comprised of an MDT including a physiotherapist, HCA, social prescriber, consultant geriatrician and GPwER in frailty. Older adults with a Rockwood score of 5 or more were assessed using the CGA domains. 

Introduction

Anticholinergic burden (ACB) is defined as the cumulative effect of taking one or more medications with anticholinergic effects (e.g. opioids, antimuscarinics and trycyclics). ACB score is a method of quantifying this. Higher ACB scores (3+) are associated with cognitive decline, risk of admissions with falls/ fractures and increased mortality.

The aim of the study was to quantify reduction in ACB score following structured medication review. The goal was to determine whether the frailty clinic was an appropriate setting for this.

Methods

Over a 5-month period the consultant geriatrician and GPwER calculated each patient’s ACB score. A medication reconciliation within their appointment facilitated deprescribing of high-risk medications. The HCA recorded ACB scores for all patients before and after medication review.

Results

54 patients attended the clinic. 18 patients had an initial ACB score of 0. The remaining 36 patients, had an ACB score of at least 1. Their mean reduction in ACB score was 1.2 points. Most pertinently, of the 19 patients with ACB scores of 3 or more, 12 left the clinic with a lower score and mean reduction was 2.1 points. One patient achieved a drop in score from 9 to 0.  Only 2 patients left with increased anticholinergic burden (in both cases, only increasin by 1 point).

Conclusions

Embedding the ACB score into the frailty clinics medication reviews were easily-achieved. This process is documented in clinic proformas, letters and the MDT discussion. This would be simple to transfer to similar settings.

Introduction: Approximately a third of community dwelling adults over the age of 65 fall each year, with around half experiencing more than one fall per year. Currently within North Tyneside older adults who have had a fall, or are at risk of falling, may be invited to attend a specialist falls clinic; if appropriate they may be referred to Age UK North Tyneside’s Strength and Balance Class. Improving strength and balance in those at risk is an established intervention, yet adherence to programmes, and the subsequent adoption of exercise post-intervention varies. This work aims to explore why participants attended (or did not attend) the classes, whether they felt benefit from the classes and if they had adopted any new behaviours into their day to day routines. Method: 18 users of the Age UK Strength and Balance users were recruited from the quantitative arm of our mixed methods project, having been attenders of both the North Tyneside Community Falls Prevention Service (NTCFPS) and Age UK classes. Participants were interviewed in the NTCFPS over a 9 month period in 2023. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, with an inductive thematic analysis approach selected for analysis. Results: Findings revealed a broadly positive experience of the classes, with participants particularly engaging with the shared background that the classes’ social support offered. Participants that were previously active were more likely to engage with further strength and balance training or resources, often wishing to continue with classes provided by Age UK. Conclusions: Users of the classes enjoyed the programme, regardless of if they felt they received benefit from them. Addressing common barriers requires better communication of logistical aids available to them. Further work is required to understand preferences of facilitators and barriers of completing further classes or training, either independently or in a group environment.

Introduction:

Frailty Hotline Service (FHS) was set up initially in January 2021 to provide 24/7 advice and guidance to care home medical staff within the Mid & South Essex Health and Care Partnership footprint as a part of covid response. This was expanded to support GPs, Urgent Care Response Team (UCRT), community hospitals, hospices etc and later established as Community Frailty Hotline Service (FHS) with an aim for hospital avoidance and provide support to frailer older patients in their own places. Later, a Frailty Virtual Ward (FVW) was established to complement FHS within the MSE HCP.

Methods:

FHS was led by 5 secondary care consultant geriatricians with direct access to telephone, 7 days service operating from 9 am till 10 pm weekdays and 9am till 10pm weekends in 1:5 rota. Unified online portal ‘Netcalls’ was used to directly call consultants. Documentation completed on dedicated Frailty Consultant Hotline Tab on SystmOne to be visible to all care providers. Data-collection automated via Netcall and SystmOne from March 2023 till January 2024.

Results:

Average number of call was 487/ month, 2098 advices given over 11 months. Referral mostly done by UCRT 1511 (72%) followed by GP 193 (9.19%). Hospital admission avoided in 7 days and 30 days where the advice given in 82.9% and 73.6% cases, respectively. Total bed days saved was 13920 Cost saving was over six million. Frailty score completed in 2982 cases. FVW referral done in 853 cases (40.6%). Feedback from FVW and UCRT, 95% found FHS was useful.

Conclusion:

Our innovative model of FHS with direct access to geriatrician showed a safe and efficient model to support frailer older patients in the community with appropriate signposting to FVW and other community services as an alternative to acute hospital emergency admission and treat the right patient in the right place.

• Collaboration between a nursing home and an ambulatory geriatric-psychiatric team to patients with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD)

Introduction

Healthcare professionals in nursing homes collaborate with specialized healthcare services to manage and support patients with BPSD. Geriatric- psychiatric ambulatory teams from the specialist health service provide professional assistance to healthcare professionals and family members for patients with geriatric psychiatric disorders and BPSD. This outreach- service is not very developed and could be further expanded. The study aimed to elucidate the collaboration between municipal health services and ambulatory geriatric-psychiatric teams within the specialist healthcare service.

Method

In this qualitative study we conducted individual interviews with six healthcare professionals representing four different nursing homes. The analysis is inspired by systematic text condensation. The research project has been submitted to the Norwegian Centre for Research Data.

Results

The informants expressed the importance of enhanced interaction with the specialist healthcare service in general and to patients with BPSD in spesific. When the informants receiving support from the team, the interaction is deemed more valuable and constructive. They find a shared meeting point with opportunity for sharing knowledge and engaging in dialogue.

Conclusion

The study indicates that health professionals see the importance of improved collaboration with specialized health services for patients with BPDS. When ambulatory teams engage actively, they experience collaboration characterized by closeness and shared understanding. The ambulatory-geriatric psychiatric team may become more well-known and the method of requesting professional help from the team can be made more transparent and clearer. It is also important that healthcare personnel proactively request professional assistance for patients with BPSD. With the increasing prevalence of patients with dementia, there is a need for further research to address the challenges in this area. Ambulatory geriatric-psychiatry teams are a service that should be explored further.

Purpose

To investigate physiotherapists’ perspectives of effective community provision following hip fracture.

Methods

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 community physiotherapists across England. Thematic analysis drawing on the Theoretical Domains Framework identified barriers and facilitators to implementation of effective provision. Interviews were complemented by process mapping community provision in one London borough, to identify points of care where suggested interventions are in place and/or could be implemented.

Results

Four themes were identified: ineffective coordination of care systems, ineffective patient stratification, insufficient staff recruitment and retention approaches and inhibitory fear avoidance behaviours. To enhance care coordination, participants suggested improving access to social services and occupational therapists, maximising multidisciplinary communication through online notation, extended physiotherapy roles, orthopaedic-specific roles and seven-day working. Participants advised the importance of stratifying patients on receipt of referrals, at assessment and into appropriately matched interventions. To mitigate insufficient staff recruitment and retention, participants proposed return-to-practice streams, apprenticeship schemes, university engagement, combined acute-community rotations and improving job description advertisements. To reduce effects of fear avoidance behaviour on rehabilitation, participants proposed the use of patient-specific goals, patient and carer education, staff education in psychological strategies or community psychologist access. Process mapping of one London borough identified points of care where suggested interventions to overcome barriers were in place and/or could be implemented.

Conclusion

Physiotherapists propose that effective provision of community physiotherapy following hip fracture could be improved by refining care coordination, utilising stratification techniques, employing enhanced recruitment and retainment strategies and addressing fear avoidance behaviours.