fracture & trauma

Background: Foot pain in older adults may reduce physical activity, resulting in impaired mobility and an increased risk of falls. Orthotics, both with and without a metatarsal pad, may provide foot pain relief and improved stability. Objective: Compare the use of Aetrex orthotics with and without a metatarsal pad in decreasing pain and fear of falling in older adults. Methods: 206 participants over 60 years old were randomised into the intervention group, who received Aetrex L2305 Orthotics with a metatarsal pad, or the control group, who received Aetrex L2300 Orthotics with no metatarsal pad. At baseline and 6-week follow-up, musculoskeletal pain was reported via Numerical Rating Scales (NRS), foot pain and functionality via the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ), and fear of falling via the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International. Results: Both groups reported significant improvements in pain in the back, hips, knees, ankles, and feet using the NRS (P < 0.001). Using the FHSQ, foot pain significantly improved in both the intervention (x̄= 18.47 ±20.58, P < 0.001) and control group (x̄= 17.21 ±18.74, P < 0.001). Function also improved significantly in both groups (x̄= 18.35 ±20.67, P < 0.001 and x̄ = 15.07 ±20.15, P < 0.001, respectively), as did fear of falling (x̄= 1.55 ±3.79, P < 0.001 and x̄= 1.23 ±3.53, P < 0.001, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed between groups for any outcome (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Aetrex orthotics, with and without metatarsal pads, decrease pain and fear of falling in older adults.

Introduction

Substantial variations remain in hip fracture care delivery across the UK despite established standards and guidelines. We aimed to predict adverse patient outcomes following hip fracture from modifiable hospital-level organisational factors and develop implementation tools to improve national service delivery.

Method

We used a national record-linkage cohort of 178,757 patients (≥60 years) with a hip fracture in England and Wales (2016–19). We linked patient-level hospital admissions, National Hip Fracture Database and mortality data with 231 metrics from 18 hospital-level organisational-level audits and reports. Multilevel models identified organisational factors, independent of patient case-mix, associated with patient outcomes: length of hospital stay, emergency 30-day readmission, 120-day mobility recovery, days in hospital and health costs over 365-days, and mortality (30- and 365-day) in 172 hospitals across England and Wales.

Results

Over one-year patients with mean (SD) age 83 (8.6) years, spent 31.7 (32.1) days in hospital, costing £14,642 (£9,017), and 50,354 (28.2%) died. We identified 46 key organisational factors independently associated with one or more patient outcome, of which 14 were (a) associated with cost and/or bed-day savings over one year, (b) consistently associated with other positive patient outcomes, and (c) potentially modifiable. Factors included weekend physiotherapy provision (mean saving per patient/year: £676 [95%CI:£67-1285]), orthogeriatrician assessment (£529 [£148-910]), direct admission to a hip fracture ward (3.4 [-0.36-7.07]days), regular dissemination of audit data to staff (0.85 [0.30-1.39]days). These data have informed the development of a hospital-specific cost-benefit calculator, with a model business case for service improvement, specialty checklists, audit and ‘how to’ guides for complex care delivery.

Conclusion

All hospitals should try to provide the best available hip fracture care equally across England and Wales. We identified multiple, potentially modifiable, organisational factors associated with important patient outcomes following hip fracture. Our practical and freely-available toolkit should help reduce variation in service delivery.

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of vertigo in older adults. Due to the high incidence of BPPV in older adults presenting with falls, vestibular assessment, and diagnosis of BPPV and other vestibular disorders has become a recommendation in the World Guidelines for Falls Prevention. There has been a paucity of evidence in well conducted randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate vitamin D for prevention of BPPV recurrence and its relation to falls and function. This is a Phase IIa single centre, placebo controlled, double blind RCT to evaluate vitamin D supplementation together with diet and Canalith Repositioning Procedure [Group A] or diet alone combined with CRP [Gorup B] can reduce recurrence rates of BPPV. Post hoc analyses were performed evaluating BPPV recurrence, falls and function. 53 participants were recruited. 14 were vitamin D replete at baseline [Group C- diet alone], the remaining 39 were randomised into Groups A and B. Group A was associated with 0.75 fewer clinical BPPV recurrences per one person year (IRD -0.75, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.32, P=0.035). Older adults in the study who suffered a fall during the 12 month follow up had lower Activities of Daily Living scores. They also had poorer Short Physical Performance Battery scores at baseline. Participants in Group A had better 5x sit to stand time compared to Group B even accounting for underlying frailty scores. 25% of participants who fell in the 12 month follow up reported fear of falling compared to 43% in those with no falls in the 12 month follow up. Vitamin D supplementation improved physical performance in 5xchair stand test. In this study population, more participants without an incident fall during follow up experience fear of falling, prompting further consideration into the complex concept that is fear of falling.

Introduction

Fall-related injuries such as fractures are on the rise as the older adult population grows in New Brunswick, Canada. These injuries can lead to hospitalization and transitions in care that are complicated for patients and families. The objective was to investigate the impact of patient navigators (PNs) working alongside the healthcare team on patient and family experiences, as compared to the usual standard of care (SOC), for adults aged 65 and older admitted with a fracture to an Orthopedic Unit at one hospital in New Brunswick.

Methods

A concurrent embedded mixed methods design, in which the quantitative randomized control trial had an embedded qualitative component. The results for the family caregiver qualitative component, which used an interpretive description approach, are presented.

Results

Semi-structured interviews were conducted and thematically analyzed for 15 family caregivers (8 PN group, 7 SOC group). The SOC caregivers, six women and one man, had a mean age of 64.6 years (SD=6.9 years). The mean age of the 8 women in the PN group was 61.3 years (SD=10.1). All participants in both SOC and PN groups self reported their ethnicity as white. Thematic analysis found that SOC group caregivers discussed patients relying on support from family and friends throughout their care journey, whereas caregivers in the PN group predominantly discussed finding PNs supportive and helpful. Both groups discussed the ongoing stress that they felt throughout the care journey of the patient for which they cared for; however, for the PN group this topic was less prevalent.

Conclusions

This study provides an understanding of the positive impacts a patient navigator can have on older adult inpatient care and transitions in care. Patient Navigators were shown to be helpful to families, particularly those of patients with higher care needs and fewer family supports.

Abstract Content - Introduction Falls are the leading cause of preventable death in older adults and can also lead to psychological consequences, including concerns about future falls. Although literature traditionally focuses on those over 65 yrs, recent research shows adults as young as 50 yrs could be at risk. Most falls occur at home and are often due to environmental hazards. Despite evidence supporting a 38% reduction in falls through home modifications, their efficacy in not fully understood. Exploring barriers and facilitators to home modifications aimed at reducing falls and concerns about falling, could better inform future interventions. Methods As part of a mixed-methods systematic review, six electronic databases were searched on February 4th 2024: Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SportsDiscus and Psycinfo. The search explored studies on home modifications for adults over 50 living at home, without residential health or rehabilitation services, specifically aimed at reducing falls incidences and concerns about falling. Barriers and facilitators to home modifications were explored from the perspectives of fallers, those at risk of falling, families, caregivers and key stakeholders. Results Thirteen of the 31 papers included in the full systematic review were focused on barriers and facilitators to home modifications. For barriers, five themes were identified: cost; stigma associated with ageing and disability; lack of awareness; fear of change and professional incompetence and inconsistency. Five themes were identified for facilitators: support from family and caregivers; early planning; involvement in decision making professional collaboration and enhanced caregiver well-being. Conclusion These findings underscore the need for multi-faceted approaches to home modifications, addressing both practical and psychological issues. Only three studies included adults 50+ yrs, with little known about the barriers and facilitators for this age onwards. Future interventions should encompass a person-centered approach, focus on increasing affordability, raising early awareness, fostering supportive networks, and ensuring high-quality professional services.

Abstract Content - Introduction. When required to multitask while walking, older adults (OA) will walk slower and use maladaptive stepping strategies such as cross-steps that may increase the risk of falling. However, most studies to date have been limited to steady-state straight-line walking, which requires limited to no visual planning, which is unrepresentative of common outdoor environments. Therefore, this study aimed to (i) investigate the impact of dual-tasking during walking of complex routes, and (ii) assess if such impact can be reduced when older adults deliberately preview their route to improve planning. Methods. We aim to recruit 45 community-dwelling OA. Preliminary results are reported for 19 (13F & 6M) community-dwelling OA without neurological or musculoskeletal diagnosis (Mean age = 75.7, range = 64–84). Participants walked along different winding paths on an 8-meter-long walkway under three conditions for 6 trials per condition: Single-task (ST), Dual-task (counting backwards) without previewing their route (DT) and Dual-task with deliberate previewing of the walking route (DTP). For each condition, we recorded walking speed, stepping errors (deviations from the pathway), and cross-steps. Results. Participants walked significantly slower during the DT condition (M=58.3 cm/s, SD=15.4) vs. ST condition (M=82.6 cm/s, SD=12.6; p<.001). during the dt condition participants also made more errors (m="1.3/trial," sd="1.4;" p=".029)" and frequent cross-steps compared to ST (no noted; m="0.4" />trial, SD=0.4). However, when allowed to preview their route prior to dual-tasking (DTP condition), participants walked faster (M=69.9 cm/s, SD=18.7; p=.002) and with fewer errors (M=0.1/trial, SD=0.1; p=.006). Conclusions. The imposition of an attentional load during adaptive walking reduces speed and increases the likelihood of potentially risky stepping strategies. Taking the time to deliberately preview the walking route seems to reverse some of these negative changes, and particularly to allow older adults to walk faster with fewer stepping errors.

Introduction

Stair falls cause approximately 230,000 injuries and 500 fatalities each year (Roys, 2001). Falls cost the NHS £4.6 million every day (AgeUK, 2010), and approximately £2 billion each year (GOV.UK, 2022), with falls on stairs accounting for the majority of these costs. However, the evidence about how to reduce stair falls is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to establish which interventions are effective or show greatest potential to improve safety on stairs and reduce falls.

Methods

Five databases were searched: Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and CINAHL. Papers were included if they were interventions or provided proof-of-principle to inform an intervention design. Papers were excluded if participants were under the age of 18, or were diagnosed with any clinical condition (disease outside that which we can expect from healthy ageing).

Results

No study reported fall occurrence as an outcome measure. Step-edge highlighters were the only intervention tested in real-world environments, as well as laboratories, and showed good proof of principle, feasibility and acceptability. Five intervention types were found that reduced fall risk in laboratory trials: lighting, horizontal-vertical illusions in ascent, stair dimensions (riser, going and pitch), avoiding multi-tasking and handrail use. These were successful in reducing mechanical demand (reducing or redistributing joint moments) and improving stepping behaviours associated with fall risk (reductions in magnitude and variability of foot clearances and overhang on the step).

Conclusion

This review has established there is no definitive evidence that any intervention reduced fall rates, but that some interventions show good proof-of-principle and feasibility: step-edge highlighters flush to the step edge, increased lighting levels, horizontal-vertical illusions in ascent, use of handrails, avoiding multi-tasking, riser heights 10.2-19cm, going lengths 22.5-32.5cm and reduced pitch angles. Future research must translate these interventions into real world settings and evaluate effectiveness to reduce fall rates.

Introduction: Concerns about falling (CaF) is a psychosocial concept, precipitating a spiral of increasing inactivity, social isolation and falls, and is common in those who have experienced, or are at risk of, a fall. One method of assessing CaF is the Falls Efficacy Scale International version (FES-I),with previous studies finding associations between higher FES-I scores and poor scoring on commonly used clinical assessments of functional mobility and balance (Gait speed (GS), Timed up and Go test (TUG), and Five time sit to stand (FTSS)). Using the FES-I to predict poor functional mobility and balance has the potential to identify those at risk before an initial fall, at which point an intervention may be provided.

Methods: A prospective study was carried out over 24 weeks, in which 119 participants were recruited from the North Tyneside Community Falls Prevention Service (NTCFPS). Participants completed questionnaires and underwent physical testing whilst attending the falls clinic (baseline) and at week 24, completing bi-weekly falls diaries throughout. Participants were users of the NTCFPS, and residents of North Tyneside.

Results: Findings showed (i) the FES-I had a limited ability to predict poor scores on GS, TUG and FTSS; (ii) attending referred Age UK strength and balance classes was significantly associated with improvements in FES-I score and FTSS; (iii) CaF at the outset of Age UK training was not significantly associated with clinically significant improvements in GS, FTSS and TUG.

Conclusions: Whilst the predictive capabilities of the FES-I were limited, the measure showed an ability to track improvements in participants CaF in the short to medium term. Further work is needed to explore the measures applications within the general population of community dwelling older adults, rather than a cohort of falls service users.

Introduction

The fall risk factors in older adults living in residential care homes for the elderly (RCHEs) are multifactorial. In Hong Kong, around 9.5% of RCHEs have a fall rate over 30% (Elderly Health Service, 2022)1. The objective of this survey is to identify the common fall risk factors among frequent fallers in RCHEs in biological, environmental, and behavioural domains, based on the World Health Organization (WHO)’s risk factor model for fall (World Health Organization, 2021)2.

Methods

197 frequent fallers from 67 RCHEs with fall prevalence over 30% in Hong Kong were included in this cross-sectional retrospective survey. Twenty fall risk factors in biological, environmental and behavioural domains were investigated through tailor-made questionnaires and staff interviews. The most common fall risk factors, the time period and places of fall of all fallers were identified. The fall management strategy including fall risk assessment and fall incident report of RCHEs were also examined and compared.

Results

In the biological domain, chronic illnesses, decreased mobility, gait instabilities, lack of physical activities and cognitive impairment are the most common fall risk factors. In the behavioural domain, unsafe behaviour such as over-estimation of self-ability and hesitation to seek assistance are the most prevalent. Key environmental fall risk factors include movable furniture and poor lighting. The most common places of falls are bedsides while the peak hours of falls occurs around meal times. Nearly 24% of RCHEs did not perform fall risk assessments for residents.

Conclusions

Behavioural and biological fall risk factors play a more important role than environmental risk factors in these frequent fallers, and many of them are modifiable. Large variations exist in the fall management of different RCHEs. Interventions to prevent falls in RCHEs should target at improving the fall management protocol and addressing the specific fall risk factors of frequent fallers. 
 

Introduction:

Older patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) and discharged home are at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Geriatric Ambulatory ED services were developed with the aim to deliver goal-directed care of older patients from ED using onward referral to Community Providers.

Method:

A retrospective review was undertaken from 13th January 2022 to 23rd December 2022 in older patients discharged from the ED following a targeted geriatric assessment and recommended community follow-up interventions. Demographic information, functional ability, hospital utilisation and mortality (up to one year), and any post-visit fragility fractures were reviewed. Data collection included identification of osteoporosis or osteopenia during or following the index ED visit.

Results:

108 patients were assessed, of whom, 74% were female, average age 76 years, range 61-93 years. 65% of patients were CFS scored, 9% were CFS 6 or 7, 15% CFS 4 or 5 and 41% CFS 1-3. GP review was advised for 76% of patients and 61% attended and therapy interventions were recommended for 9.3%, of whom, 3% attended. The majority presented with falls (82%) and half of those who fell, sustained a fracture. Osteoporosis or osteopenia was newly identified in 30% but in 44% of patients bone health remained unevaluated and only 8% had newly initiated anti-resorptive and 9% existing treatment. 4% experienced fragility fracture following their ED visit. Uptake was low for therapy (30%) and nursing interventions (14%). Following the index ED visit, 7% patients attended ED within 7-days, and 5% admitted to hospital within 30-days. 35% of patients re-attended ED and 22% were hospitalised within one year. One year mortality was 5%.

Conclusion:

ED targeted geriatric assessment can identify patients with falls and fragility fractures but better collaboration and communication between primary and secondary care is needed. Recommended bone health assessment occurred in a relatively small proportion of patients.