Joints

The topic content is divided into the information types below

Poster ID
2963
Authors' names
Dr Simeon Harrow1, Dr Aaruran Nadarajasundaram2, Dr Mihir Gajre1, Dr Scott Nicholson1, Dr Clare Hunt1
Author's provenances
1Tunbridge Wells Hospital, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust; 2St Thomas’ Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust

Abstract

Background:

- Falls and associated injuries are a significant area of concern for older adults. Approximately 30% of those aged over 65 and 50% of those aged over 80 experience at least one fall each year.

- NICE guidelines state, “Older people who present for medical attention because of a fall, should be offered a multifactorial falls risk assessment”, which includes review of visual impairment.

 

Aims:

- To identify if visual impairment was documented on the orthopaedic clerking document for patients admitted following fall.

- To raise awareness of visual impairment as being a significant risk factor for falls in the elderly population.

 

Methods:

- Data collection was carried out retrospectively for patients presenting following a fall at Tunbridge Wells Hospital, via the orthopaedic admission list.

- Initially, data was collected from April to May 2024 and then from July to August 2024 following the first teaching intervention.

 

Results:

- 6% of patients (n = 50) admitted following a fall had visual status documented in the orthopaedic clerking document.

- Following the first intervention, 20% of documentation noted visual impairment.

 

Conclusion:

- Visual impairment was not routinely documented on orthopaedic clerking.

- The first intervention involved delivering a teaching session to the orthopaedic department, highlighting the significance of visual impairment contributing to falls.

- Data collection from July to August 2024 has shown an improvement in documentation, whereby 20% of documentation noted visual impairment.

- The second intervention will involve including these findings in the departmental induction and designing a poster to raise awareness.

Poster ID
2951
Authors' names
Rogayah Mustafa, Arshiya Khan, Najah Daud, Sankkita Vivekananthan, Fatima Hamdani, Sally Bashford
Author's provenances
Hinchingbrooke Hospital, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE29 6NT

Abstract

Introduction:

Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures to factors like falls resulting from postural instability, polypharmacy, and muscle weakness. Reduced bone mineral density (BMD), often caused by vitamin D deficiency, disease severity, and low BMI, further elevates fracture risk in PD patients. This project aims to improve awareness and bone health testing in PD patients by focusing on vitamin D, bone profile assessments, DEXA scans, and FRAX scores for fracture risk evaluation and management.

Methodology:

This QIP involved two cycles focused on managing Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients. The first cycle interventions focused on educating doctors through sessions and a poster, while the second cycle introduced personalized treatment plans for PD patients, recorded in their clinical notes. A comparative analysis of post-intervention data was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of both interventions.

Results:

Bone profile testing was successfully completed in 100% of patients after both interventions. In cycle 1, 63.3% of patients required vitamin D testing, compared to 25% in cycle 2. Of these, 14.3% received testing after the first intervention, and 100% after the second. However, none of the patients had their FRAX scores calculated or DEXA scans scheduled. The teaching session increased overall confidance amongst junior doctors in diagnosing osteoporosis from 60% to 70%, and managing osteoporosis from 10% to 80%. It also improved the overall awareness on how to use the FRAX tool from around 50% to 90%. 

Conclusion:

Personalized treatment plans and targeted interventions led to significant improvements in vitamin D testing. However, notable gaps remain in adherence to FRAX calculation and organizing DEXA scans. Future efforts should focus on these limitations and ensuring complete bone health assessments for PD patients. The teaching sessions proved to be highly effective, significantly enhancing participants' understanding of bone health issues in Parkinson's disease.

Presentation

Comments

Very interesting. Have you considered the role of your electronic notes system in improving FRAX calculation rates (you may not use electronic notes at your hospital not sure!). Potentially the use of popups when a patient is coded to have a 'fracture' or 'fall' or 'frailty' might be useful to prompt clinicians to calculate a FRAX score and consider early bone health medication prescription :)

Submitted by emily.buchanan on

Permalink

Good afternoon,

Thank you for your question and suggestions.

I agree that we need a more efficient method to identify patients requiring bone protection.

This is something we highlighted in our QIP report for the hospital’s Quality Improvement Forum. The idea of "pop-up" alerts is promising, as they draw focused attention to specific messages.

One of our interventions included reviewing the electronic clinical notes of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) and recommending that the primary team calculate FRAX scores and take appropriate action.

Other interventions, such as requesting blood tests for bone profile and vitamin D levels, were well-received, though unfortunately, we did not observe any recorded FRAX calculations. Possible reasons could include calculation errors, documentation oversights, the time-intensive nature of FRAX, or the need to prioritize acute issues.

In conclusion, there remains substantial room for improvement in clinical practice regarding bone protection, particularly for high-risk patients like those with Parkinson's Disease.

Thank you for your interest in our poster!

Submitted by susannah.cooper on

Permalink
Poster ID
2958
Authors' names
Dr Kyle Treherne & Dr Amanda Kilsby
Author's provenances
Older People’s Medicine Department, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (NUTH)

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for management of head injuries on anticoagulation were updated in 2023, to maximise detection of clinically important falls whilst minimising unnecessary scans. They recommend computed tomography (CT) imaging to be considered within 8 hours if clinically appropriate [NG232].[1] The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (NUTH) current local inpatient falls protocol recommends that all patients who have fallen with suspected head injury, on anticoagulation but in the absence of neurological changes or other underlying risk factors, should undergo CT imaging. This quality improvement project reviewed outcomes in this patient subset, retrospectively analysing patient data during a four-month period.

Between April to August 2024, 550 inpatient adult non-contrast CT head scans were performed at the Freeman Hospital (NUTH). 172 (31.2%, median age 77) of these scans were performed following an inpatient fall. 73 (42.4%) of these scans were performed with active anticoagulation as the solitary indication; in these patients, none (0%) had haemorrhagic pathology and therefore no neurosurgical intervention was required. This data strongly supports a review to rationalise our inpatient fall guidelines to align with the updated NICE recommendations which emphasise clinical judgement and shared decision making. This change should result in a meaningful reduction in valuable CT scanning and reporting time, associated costs and radiation exposure, without compromising patient care and outcomes.

 

[1] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Head injury: assessment and early management NICE guideline [NG232]. 2023.

Comments

Thanks for the poster, interesting to read just how low the yield is for this indication! 

I was wondering about your thoughts around shared decision making. For older patients in hospital, for whom many of these individuals may have delirium (and hence why they may have fallen), how would shared decision making look? I'm particularly thinking out of hours, where capacity to ring NoK would be limited. How feasible is that recommendation within guidelines for a junior doctor working out of hours? 

Thanks for your question. The common scenario you have described certainly presents challenges applying these recommendations. The NICE guidance describes CT imaging should be performed within 8 hours of the injury - if appropriate, some decisions could be deferred to the day team to facilitate involvement of NoK. In other instances, I think clinical judgment would have to take precedence given potential barriers to shared decision making, although I'm open to suggestions!

Submitted by jane.walton on

Permalink

Thank you for this, really interesting. I wonder whether the results of this would also be applicable to other patients with head injury on anticoagulants, either in the community, or those presenting to A&E after a fall? In my experience A&E does a lot of CT imaging for this cohort.

Submitted by carole.macgregor on

Permalink
Poster ID
2553
Authors' names
A Buck1,2,3; A Ali1,3
Author's provenances
1. The University of Sheffield; 2. Barnsley Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; 3. Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Abstract

Introduction

Hip fracture is the most common fracture in adults over 60 years, affecting approximately 70,000 people in the UK in 2019. Mortality after hip fracture continues to be high and the cost of hip fracture is estimated at £1.1 billion per year for the NHS. It has been shown that there are key clinical indicators which can improve patient outcomes. These are monitored annually in the UK by the national hip fracture database (NHFD).

Methods

Our aim was to look at the demographics and clinical codes for patients admitted with hip fracture, codes when they are readmitted and cause of death. Information analysts at both hospitals provided authors with these data from hip fracture admissions in 2020. Inclusion criteria reflected the inclusion criteria for the NHFD. Cause of death was identified from records in the medical examiner's offices for inpatient deaths. Data were viewed and analysed in Microsoft Excel.

Results

In total, there were 878 admissions for hip fracture in 2020, 312 at Barnsley Hospital (BH) and 566 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals (STH). Average age was 80.9 at BH and 82.6 at STH. The most frequent codes on admission were 'fall' and the most common complication was pneumonia, coded in 23% of patients. 174 (56%) individuals at BH had at least one readmission in the first year and 318 (57%) at STH. The codes for readmission were varied, most commonly for musculoskeletal or orthopaedic conditions, including fracture. 85 died within one year (27.2%) and 26 died within 30 days (8.3%) at BH. 186 died within one year (32.7%) and 69 within 30 days (12.1%) at STH. The commonest cause of death was pneumonia, in 26 of 66 inpatient deaths.

Conclusions

This analysis of coding data confirms known complications following hip fracture. Morbidity and mortality following hip fracture remains extremely high.

Presentation

Having difficulty viewing the stream? Try adjusting your browser settings.

As a fallback the stream can be viewed in a separate tab, however CPD tracking will not work.

Comments

Poster ID
2558
Authors' names
Adam Carter, Bahig Aziz, Mitveer Gill, Louise Pack, Adam Harper
Author's provenances
Princess Royal Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Hip fractures tend to affect older, frailer people and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The Best Practice Tariff (B PT) was introduced to recognise gold standard care. Features of the BPT include prompt surgical and orthogeriatric input, with multidisciplinary working throughout. Subsequent service changes have led to the creation of specialist hip fracture wards. However, it is not always possible to admit patients with a fractured neck of femur to a specialist hip fracture ward.

 

We reviewed data for 691 patients admitted with a primary neck of femur fracture to a district general hospital in Sussex between 01/02/2023 and 29/02/2024. We compared the demographics and outcomes of patients admitted to a specialist hip fracture ward (SHFW) and a general surgical ward (GSW) using data available from the National Hip Fracture Database. 570 patients were admitted to the SHFW, 121 to the GSW.

 

BPT achievement was significantly higher on the SHFW (74% SHFW, 53% GSW, p<0.00001). 30-day mortality was lower on the SHFW, although this was not statistically significant (2.98% SHFW, 5.79% GSW, p=0.126). We found no significant difference in patient age, time to surgery, time to orthogeriatrician review, or length of stay.

 

This analysis highlights the importance of a specialist multidisciplinary team approach in the management of patients presenting with fractured neck of femur. While not a perfect metric, non-achievement of the BPT is likely to result in worse patient care, with higher mortality and poorer longer term functional outcomes. BPT non-achievement is also associated with significant loss of income to NHS trusts. We suggest that, wherever possible, beds on specialist hip fracture wards should be ring fenced for patients with primary neck of femur fracture.

Presentation

Poster ID
2712
Authors' names
H Urrehman; M Elamurugan; A Matsko; C Abbott
Author's provenances
Care of the Elderly, Wrexham Maelor Hospital
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are a common factor in acute presentations to the emergency department (ED). Effective pain management is crucial for patient comfort and recovery, yet pain control for MSK injuries admitted under the medical team often falls short of optimal standards. This quality improvement project aims to evaluate and enhance the prescription practices for pain relief in elderly patients with MSK injuries at the Wrexham Maelor Hospital (WMH) ED. Methods:  A two cycle project was completed in which patients with MSK injuries were identified and reviewed regarding any pain relief they may have been prescribed (regular or PRN). Following cycle 1, interventions were put in place and prescribing practices were reassessed. Inclusion criteria: >60 years of age, MSK injury described in notes. Each cycle of data collection lasted a week, with a sample size of 17 and 14 patients respectively. Results: Cycle 1 No pain relief- 33% PRN Only- 6% Regular Only- 50% Both- 11% A significant number of patients were not receiving adequate pain relief, highlighting the need for improved pain management protocols. Interventions Educational posters were displayed around the emergency department and the frailty hub, and a presentation was given to the frailty team. Cycle 2 (post intervention) No pain relief- 14% PRN Only- 29% Regular Only- 21% Both- 36% Post-intervention results showed a marked improvement in pain management, with fewer patients receiving no pain relief and an increase in the combined use of PRN and regular pain relief. Conclusion: The quality improvement project highlights the necessity for targeted interventions to enhance pain management for elderly patients with MSK injuries in the ED. Preliminary results suggest that increased awareness and education among medical staff can potentially improve pain relief prescription rates.

Presentation

Comments

Whilst I am totally on board with the idea and promote similar ideas where I work, your drug recommendations box doesn't look ideal for frail older people. Whilst simple analgesic (low) doses of ibuprofen are usually OK, stronger NSAIDs cause fluid retention, risk GI bleeds and other side effects. Maybe a less broad recommendation would be better? I regularly see patients who have got into trouble on short courses of naproxen and diclofenac given in the community. Codeine also unpredictable due to it's pharmacology and should nearly always be given with laxatives.

Submitted by Dr Jackie Pace on

Permalink
Poster ID
2648
Authors' names
Tayyab Mahmood & Daniel Enwereji
Author's provenances
Department of Geriatrics, Kings college hospital NHS Foundation trust
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency has become commonplace, especially in older people. Given the role it plays in bone health and falls prevention, as well as the growing evidence of its extra-skeletal actions, it is important to treat vitamin D deficiency adequately. Our practice has been 2 to 3 weeks of daily treatment with 50,000IU ergocalciferol as a loading dose. However, recent guidelines recommend half this total cumulative dose given over a period of 6 to 8 weeks. Rather than promptly following the guidelines and changing our practice, we opted to conduct a quality improvement project (QIP) looking at the effectiveness of our protocol for treating Vitamin D deficiency in older patients. In the initial project patients admitted to an acute geriatric ward and found to have vitamin D deficiency were prescribed a 2 weeks course of daily ergocalciferol. In the second project, patients with severe deficiency (<20 IU/ml) received 3 weeks of treatment. In all patients pre- and post-treatment vitamin D levels were done. In total 76 patients were included. Results: all patients demonstrated significant improvement. Post-treatment serum vitamin D levels returned to normal in 66%. The median change in vitamin D level was 265%. Importantly no side effects were noted and no patient reached toxic serum vitamin D levels. Conclusion: Our results show that doses higher than the current recommendations for treating vitamin D deficiency are needed to replenish depleted vitamin D stores in older people. Compared to recommended strategies which generally span over 6 to 8 weeks, our daily protocol provides rapid replacement over 2 to 3 weeks. It is effective and safe with no side-effects. The short course of daily treatment should also increase patient compliance

 

Presentation

Having difficulty viewing the stream? Try adjusting your browser settings.

As a fallback the stream can be viewed in a separate tab, however CPD tracking will not work.

Poster ID
2576
Authors' names
Elmar Kal, Neza Grilc, Jasmine Menant, Daina Sturnieks, Diego Kaski, Toby Ellmers
Author's provenances
1. Brunel University London. 2. Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA). 3. UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and The NHNN. 4. Imperial College
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Abstract

Introduction.

In older adults, dizziness is often experienced as a vague feeling of subjective unsteadiness, where people perceive themselves to be swaying more than they actually are. One factor that potentially drives such distorted perceptions of instability is (hyper)vigilance towards balance. This study aimed to investigate if older adults who report higher levels of trait balance vigilance (i) are more likely to report sensations of general unsteadiness when their balance is acutely threatened, and (ii) if this is accompanied by maladaptive changes in postural control.

Methods.

Forty-eight healthy older adults without vestibular diagnosis (Mean age = 71.0, range = 60–83) completed the recently validated Balance-Vigilance Questionnaire to quantify trait balance vigilance. Participants were fitted a VR headset and completed 60-second, narrow-stance balance trials on a force platform, under conditions designed to create a threatening (standing at a 20-meter virtual height) or non-threatening (virtual ground level) environment. For each condition, we assessed self-reported stability (0-100%) and fear of falling (0-100%), postural control (sway amplitude and frequency), muscular control (tibialis anterior activity), and prefrontal and somatosensory cortical activity using fNIRS.

Results.

Preliminary results are reported. When presented with a postural threat, high-vigilant older adults (Balance Vigilance Score≥18; N=13) reported significantly greater fear of falling (+25%; p=.027) and more reduced perceived stability (-25%; p=.006) compared to low-vigilant older adults – despite there being no differences in actual sway amplitude (p=.157). Only the low-vigilant group showed evidence of an adaptive ‘stiffening’ strategy in response to threat: i.e. increased sway frequency (p=.028) and tibialis anterior activity (p=.027). fNIRS analysis is ongoing.

Conclusions.

These preliminary findings suggest that, in response to a postural threat, older adults with high balance-vigilance are more likely to experience excessive fear of falling and perceptions of instability, and may fail to make adaptive changes to their postural control. Screening for excessive balance vigilance may therefore be recommended.

Presentation

Having difficulty viewing the stream? Try adjusting your browser settings.

As a fallback the stream can be viewed in a separate tab, however CPD tracking will not work.

Comments

Hello and thank you for presenting your work.  You conclude that higher-vigilant people are more likely to have fear of falling (which makes sense) but also conclude that those people may fail to make adaptive changes - what are your thoughts about higher vigilant people over-correcting, thereby increasing their risk of falling - e.g. reaching out to grab something to steady themselves, which results in distorting their centre of gravity, before they are safely within reach of the item?

Submitted by gordon.duncan on

Permalink

Thank you for that question! Yes we do think that hypervigilance will contribute to overly cautious behaviour as you describe. For instance, a recent study by Castro et al. showed that older people with unexplained dizziness (who we previously found to exhibit greater balance vigilance) have a reduced stepping threshold in response to perturbations.



An explanation for a reduced stepping threshold could be related to our study's finding of greater perceptions of instability coupled to a suppressed automatic stiffening response in high-vigilant individuals. That is, any perturbation will be experienced as more threatening and destabilising, but the lack of automatic stiffening response would also make it more difficult to rapidly counteract such perturbation - thus warranting a step to be taken.

That said, unfortunately vigilance was not directly assessed in the Castro et al study, and in our study we only assessed static balance, so next we now need to look into the role of vigilance in the response/recovery to perturbation of balance.

Poster ID
2578
Authors' names
O McVeigh-Mellor1; E Vincent1; A Siu1; A Cocks1; E Kal1;
Author's provenances
1. Dept of Health Sciences; Brunel University London.
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Abstract Content - Introduction. When required to multitask while walking, older adults (OA) will walk slower and use maladaptive stepping strategies such as cross-steps that may increase the risk of falling. However, most studies to date have been limited to steady-state straight-line walking, which requires limited to no visual planning, which is unrepresentative of common outdoor environments. Therefore, this study aimed to (i) investigate the impact of dual-tasking during walking of complex routes, and (ii) assess if such impact can be reduced when older adults deliberately preview their route to improve planning. Methods. We aim to recruit 45 community-dwelling OA. Preliminary results are reported for 19 (13F & 6M) community-dwelling OA without neurological or musculoskeletal diagnosis (Mean age = 75.7, range = 64–84). Participants walked along different winding paths on an 8-meter-long walkway under three conditions for 6 trials per condition: Single-task (ST), Dual-task (counting backwards) without previewing their route (DT) and Dual-task with deliberate previewing of the walking route (DTP). For each condition, we recorded walking speed, stepping errors (deviations from the pathway), and cross-steps. Results. Participants walked significantly slower during the DT condition (M=58.3 cm/s, SD=15.4) vs. ST condition (M=82.6 cm/s, SD=12.6; p<.001). during the dt condition participants also made more errors (m="1.3/trial," sd="1.4;" p=".029)" and frequent cross-steps compared to ST (no noted; m="0.4" />trial, SD=0.4). However, when allowed to preview their route prior to dual-tasking (DTP condition), participants walked faster (M=69.9 cm/s, SD=18.7; p=.002) and with fewer errors (M=0.1/trial, SD=0.1; p=.006). Conclusions. The imposition of an attentional load during adaptive walking reduces speed and increases the likelihood of potentially risky stepping strategies. Taking the time to deliberately preview the walking route seems to reverse some of these negative changes, and particularly to allow older adults to walk faster with fewer stepping errors.

Comments

Hello.  Thank you for creating a poster to show your work. Which interventions do you envisage would improve gaze behaviour while walking?

Submitted by gordon.duncan on

Permalink
Poster ID
2531
Authors' names
F Hallam-Bowles1, 2; A Kilby3; M Westlake1; AL Gordon1; S Timmons1; PA Logan1, 4; K Robinson1
Author's provenances
1. University of Nottingham; 2. Research and Innovation, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; 3. Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust; 4. Nottingham CityCare Partnership
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Abstract

Introduction

The Action Falls programme has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing falls amongst care home residents in a trial but has not been implemented widely (Logan et al, BMJ, 2021, 375, e066991). Co-production of implementation has been identified as a mechanism for achieving buy-in. This study aimed to co-produce an implementation model.

Methods

Systemic action research with an appreciative approach framed co-production workshops in three stakeholder groups: residents and relatives, care home staff and representatives from health and social care organisations. Topics explored were stakeholder priorities, design of the implementation model and evaluation outcomes. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently to identify key themes. Participating stakeholders were invited to a celebration event to discuss key themes, share ideas and finalise the model.

Results

One action research cycle was completed. Eighteen workshops were undertaken with 16 stakeholders (7 care staff, 7 health and social care representatives, 1 resident and 1 relative). Falls training was reported as an area requiring improvement. The main priority identified was the need for a shared approach to learning about falls. Other themes were: tailoring training to individual and care home learning needs, involving key people in falls learning, safe spaces to share experiences and build relationships, providing regular learning opportunities, confidence in falls management as an appropriate measure of implementation success, and the need for a mixed methods approach to evaluate the model. A shared learning model was developed at the celebration event. The model included three components: accessible information for residents and relatives, bespoke training for each care home, and provision of ongoing support.

Conclusions

A shared learning model was co-produced as part of the Action Falls implementation strategy. This now needs evaluation.

 

 

Presentation

Having difficulty viewing the stream? Try adjusting your browser settings.

As a fallback the stream can be viewed in a separate tab, however CPD tracking will not work.

Comments

Very nice to see this co-production approach to identify the learning required to reduce falls in care home. I am sure this will result in much more engagement with the learning programme in the end. I hope you have data of falls frequency and type prior to the intervention so that you can monitor changes.

I wondered if you have considered increasing the numbers of relatives involved in the next phase given that they may be able to both help their loved one whilst they are visiting but also identify when their carers are not proficient

Thank you for your comment and interest in this work.

In this next stage, we are collecting case studies to explore different approaches to implement the bespoke and ongoing support components of the learning model in practice. This includes a new falls lead role and a community of practice. Based on the stakeholder's prioritisation of outcomes in the co-production workshops, our primary outcome for the next research cycle is changes in confidence among care home staff. We are evaluating this using pre and post surveys, interviews and observations. 

We are planning to involve residents and relatives in greater numbers and agree that relatives bring valuable experiences and expertise. We plan to work with established networks and partnerships to achieve this, such as ENRICH, and will work with residents and relatives to develop falls information resources. 

Submitted by vijay.sharma on

Permalink