Exercise interventions

Background  

University Hospital Southampton (UHS) partnered with Saints Foundation (SF), to test the feasibility and acceptability of a non-registered Exercise Practitioner (EP) to work alongside the therapy team to promote physical activity (PA) of hospitalised older people. Our aim was to collect trust level data to review the impact the EP had on outcomes such as length of stay (LOS) and discharge destination (DD) and identify and address any additional challenges that arose. 

Methods  

The EP delivered twice weekly gym-based group interventions as well as regular 1:1 rehabilitation and education sessions to hospitalised older patients. Interventions were ward based or within the acute therapy gym.  

Results  

Between June and August 2023 the EP reviewed 82 patients, mean age of 88 years. 15 (18%) patients underwent 1:1 rehabilitation whereas 67 (82%) patients underwent gym-based rehabilitation sessions. Median LOS for patients reviewed by the EP was 15 days compared with average departmental LOS of 8 days. 53 (65%) patients were able to either maintain or improve their predicted to actual discharge destination, compared with 10 (12%) patients whose physical capability declined. Of those remaining, 1 patient died and 18 others had not yet been discharged. High patient satisfaction levels continued to be reported.  

Conclusion  

Intervention by a non-registered EP appears to have an impact on patients’ ability to maintain or improve level of function and physical dependency during acute hospital stay.  Factors such as outbreaks of infectious illness and staffing challenges prevented more frequent EP led intervention. Next steps include introducing daily class-based interventions. Participants will be encouraged to attend at least three classes. Anticipated benefits include improvement in patients’ functional levels and reductions in physical dependency on discharge.  Additional data will be collected on fear of falling and confidence in function as well as uptake of post discharge activity and readmission. 

Introduction: Research suggests that physical and cognitive exercise can have a positive effective on those with dementia, but less is known about such interventions in those at risk for dementia. Understanding the feasibility of administering clinical assessments remotely using Zoom for Healthcare^TM in the context of a dementia prevention trial for at risk older adults is not well understood.

Methods: SYNERGIC@Home/SYNERGIE~Chez soi (NCT04997681) is a home-based, remotely delivered clinical trial targeting older adults at risk for dementia. Participants underwent a screening/baseline assessment and were randomized to one of four physical and cognitive exercise intervention arms for 16 weeks (3 times per week). They were reassessed immediately post-intervention and 6-months later. The standardized assessments of cognition, physical activity, mobility, mental health, nutrition, sleep, and quality of life were done at all three points. A research coordinator completed the assessments on a one-on-one basis via Zoom for Healthcare^TM. The quality of life questionnaire was mailed to the participant.

Results: Forty-eight of 60 participants (80%) (mean age 68.7 ± 5.7 years, 81.3% female) completed the study. Most participants (75.0%) were cognitively intact with at least 2 dementia risk factors. No participants withdrew from the trial because of difficulty with the remote delivery of the assessments. There were no statistically significant changes in any of the assessments of cognition, physical activity, mobility, mental health, nutrition, sleep, or quality of life throughout the study.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates it is possible to administer standardized clinical assessments of cognition, physical activity, mobility, mental health, nutrition, sleep, and quality of life remotely in the context of a clinical trial. The study was not powered to detect meaningful differences in these assessments. Nevertheless, this confirms the feasibility of remotely administering clinical assessments to older adults at risk for dementia

Introduction

Highly challenging, regular strength and balance exercise classes (SBE) reduces fall risk but there are few options for long-term continuation. SBE could be delivered by the voluntary sector, but care is needed to ensure good fidelity. The feasibility of delivering evidence-based SBE outside the governance of health services is unclear. A voluntary sector-led weekly SBE class ‘Strong and Steady (S&S)’, led by a level 4 qualified postural stability and funded via grants and fees, was set up in December 2022 alongside an existing community coffee morning.

Methods

Baseline measures and adherence were collected for all who commenced S&S. Two classes were observed using a standardised fidelity checklist. Interviews and focus groups were undertaken with class participants, a previous participant, the exercise instructor and lead volunteer.

Results

Since December 2022, 24 participants aged 59-95 (63% female) self-referred to S&S. Baseline measures, collected in 100% of assessments, (timed up and go, four-step balance scale and 60-second sit-to-stand) indicated performance slightly below age-matched norms with the exception of falls efficacy (FES-I). Three participants dropped out (1 died) and adherence was 67%. Fidelity in both observed classes was good (mean score 21/24). Four themes emerged from thematic analysis of all the interviews and focus groups: 1. S&S was associated with a range of benefits to health and wellbeing that contributed to participant uptake, adherence and to staff satisfaction. 2. Limiting class size is necessary to maintain fidelity and safety. 3. The social element of the class was a key driver in participation. 4. The participants of S&S had high levels of self-efficacy and motivation to participate in exercise

Conclusion

Delivering SBE via the voluntary sector is feasible and can be delivered with good fidelity. The provision tends to attract people who have high levels of self-efficacy and motivation to exercise.

Introduction: Older adults are the fastest growing and most sedentary group in society. With sedentary behaviour associated with deleterious health outcomes, reducing sedentary time may improve overall well-being. Adults aged ≥75 years are underrepresented in sedentary behaviour research. This study aimed to qualitatively profile the sedentary behaviour of adults aged ≥75 years. This included ascertaining older adults’ understanding of sedentary behaviour; identifying the activities performed in sitting and standing and identifying the barriers and facilitators towards reducing sedentary time.

Methods: Four focus groups with community-dwelling older adults aged ≥75 years were held between October-December 2022. Audio recordings and workshop notes were transcribed verbatim and inductive and deductive thematic analyses were conducted.

Results: Six community-dwelling older adults with a mean age of 83 were recruited. Group members were largely unaware of their sedentary behaviour, and the risk associated with prolonged sedentary behaviour. The activities performed in sitting and standing, and barriers and facilitators to reducing sedentary time were charted to the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B). Analytical themes explored sedentary behaviour throughout older adulthood, the influence of sedentary behaviour on sleep, and the importance of social connectedness to reduce sedentary time.

Conclusions: This study provided novel insights into older adults’ reports of sedentary behaviour progressing throughout older adulthood. Sedentary behaviour in adults aged ≥75 years present similarly to a younger subset of older adults with regards to the activities performed in sitting, and the barriers and facilitators to reducing their sedentary time. However, the activities performed in sitting may be performed for longer, and the barriers to reducing sedentary behaviour may present more frequently. Social support appears valuable when attempting to reduce sedentary time, however, further research is necessary to explore the views of older adults who are socially isolated.

Introduction

The UK Parkinson's Audit assesses whether patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) are managed according to standards. Referring patients to physiotherapy (PT) and advising those with daytime sleepiness not to drive are two of these. In our clinic, patients identified as drivers are advised to inform the DVLA and will undergo a MOCA, sleep questionnaire and driving assessment. 

Project Aim

Are we making early physiotherapy referrals and documenting driving status in new diagnosed outpatients? 

Methods

Online notes of newly diagnosed patients over a 12 month period were reviewed. A clinic checklist was created and displayed in the clinic as a poster with the mnemonic:

Lasting Power of Attorney

Driving

Osteoporosis

Physiotherapy

Anticipatory Care Planning

Following introduction of the checklist a further cycle has taken place. 

Results

In the initial cycle, 34 newly diagnosed patients were identified. 4 were nursing home residents and excluded from results. Of the remaining, 83% had documentation of driving status. 2 patients were drivers and 1 had evidence of completed driving assessments. 20 patients were referred to physiotherapy and a further 3 were offered (76%). 50% of referrals were within the first month of diagnosis. Following checklist introduction, 21 new PD patients were identified over 6 months. The clinic team were sent updated data throughout to encourage ongoing improvements. 95% had documentation of driving status. 9 were drivers. 6 had full driving assessment completed. 16 (76%) patients were referred to physiotherapy. 75% of these were referred within the first month. 

Conclusions

Repeat data collection has shown improvement in both driving status documentation and early physiotherapy referral. The checklist reminds us of important aspects of outpatient care in PD that may otherwise get forgotten. Ongoing data collection will hopefully continue to improve. 

Abstract: Ageing is a complex biological process that is progressive in nature. There is a decline observed in the muscle mass and the sensorimotor systems which may contribute to decreased balance and stability while walking.Balance is one of the most crucial intrinsic risk factor for the occurrence of falls. Falls are the leading cause of fatal and non fatal injuries among the elderly.Multiple studies indicate that a structured exercise program helps in improving balance and reducing risk of falls.Exercises can be performed on land as well as in water.Thereby the need of the study to evaluate the effect of land vs aquatic exercises on balance in the elderly.

Method :A Randomised Control Trial with 40 elderly’s selected based on the inclusion criteria; randomly divided in 2 groups. Balance was assessed using Tinetti POMA scale. Exercises were done 3 times a week on alternate days. Below are the walking activities: Walking forward 11 feet. Marching forward 11 feet. Sidestepping without crossing legs 11 feet. Tandem walking 11 feet. Below are the exercise activities. Marching in place. Hip flexion/extension .Hip abduction/adduction. Toe raises/heel raises. Shallow knee bends. Sit to stand from chair in land group. Sit to stand from pool shelf in aquatic group.

Results :Wilcoxin pair signed rank test was used for within group pre and post analysis, for land exercise the two tailed p value <0.0001, which is extremely significant; for aquatic exercises the two tailed p values < 0.0001, which is extremely significant.For between group analysis Mann Whitney Test was used, the two tailed p value < 0.0001, which is extremely significant.

Conclusion:The results show that there is an improvement in balance post both land and aquatic exercises individually, but when compared between the two mediums aquatic exercises showed a better result.

Index terms : Land exercises, Aquatic exercises, Balance in elderly, reduce risk of fall

Introduction

Resistance exercise is an effective intervention for older people at risk of, or living with, sarcopenia and frailty. Surveys of current UK practice in exercise prescription for these conditions found that  resistance exercise was offered in only 9% of departments and was often not optimised for sarcopenia and frailty. The Benchmarking Exercise Programmes for Older People (BEPOP) project is a joint British Geriatrics Society and AGILE initiative to promote best practice in the prescription of resistance exercise for older people.

Methods

Using an online data collection tool, 10 services delivering exercise interventions to older people from across the UK submitted anonymized details of baseline assessment (including demographics), exercise prescription and progression, and outcomes, for up to 20 consecutive patients referred to their services with probable sarcopenia, frailty, falls, and reduced mobility. Descriptive data were reviewed and analysed by an expert panel comprising physiotherapists, geriatricians, and exercise specialists.

Results

Data were analysed for 188 patients with a mean age of 80 years (range 60-101). At the time of referral, 154 (83%) patients did not have a diagnosis of sarcopenia. At baseline, 115 (61%) patients received an objective assessment of muscle strength. The most common modality of resistance exercise prescribed was bodyweight exercises (n=173, 92%) followed by resistance bands (n=49, 26%). Progression of exercise programmes was predominantly through increased repetitions (n=163, 87%) rather than increased load. Forty-one (24%) patients did not undergo any review to inform progression of exercise dose. Fifty patients (30%) patients did not have re-assessment of the outcome measures recorded at baseline on completion of the prescribed exercise programme.

Conclusion

Multiple opportunities exist to improve both the diagnosis and assessment of sarcopenia, and the prescription, delivery, and monitoring of resistance exercise. BEPOP will provide individualized benchmarking reports to each site to facilitate quality improvement and local service development.