Training and Careers

Introduction

Authoritative medical organisations including the Resuscitation Council UK, NHS and BMA all state that Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions should only be relevant to CPR and should not impact other decisions about care and treatment. We set out to examine the reality of decision making in clinical practice.

Methods

We circulated a clinical scenario of a patient deteriorating with COVID-19 after hip fracture to 128 members of the consultant and trainee geriatrician WhatsApp groups in Wales. Recipients were blindly randomised to one of two versions; differing only in whether or not they included the words “She has a DNACPR in place”. Recipients were unaware of the survey’s purpose. We surveyed individuals’ management decisions using a multiple-choice Likert scale questionnaire.

Results

A total of 47 (37%) clinicians responded. Those who addressed the scenario without a DNACPR decision were more likely to consider non-invasive ventilation (91% vs 67%, P<0.05), and more likely to consider escalation to intensive care (26% vs 21%).

Decisions in respect of ward level care were also affected. In the absence of a DNACPR decision, clinicians were more active in providing naloxone for a potential opioid toxicity (57% vs 29%).

Conclusion

Patients’ concern that a DNACPR decision might reduce the intensity of care they might receive do not appear to be unfounded. We believe that this study demonstrates the reality of clinical decision making in acute patient care.

These clinicians will have been aware that DNACPR status should have no influence on other clinical decision making, but unconscious bias clearly has substantial influence despite this. We do not believe that training to reinforce such knowledge will ever fully compensate for such unconscious bias.

Clinicians need to consider how DNACPR decisions are made, recorded and communicated given this risk of unforeseen consequences for other aspects of care.

Introduction: At Warrington hospital, a small district general, the orthogeriatric team adheres to national guidelines by conducting bone health assessments for inpatients with neck-of- femur (NOF) fractures and commencing suitable secondary prevention measures. However, there is a noticeable gap in secondary prevention for patients with non-NOF fractures requiring admission (such as tibial or humeral fractures). This predisposes patients to a future increased risk of disability, morbidity and mortality following discharge.

Method: A Quality Improvement initiative was launched, introducing various interventions such as educational sessions for doctors and pharmacists, E-learning modules and a flow chart poster guiding bone health assessment. Bone health teaching and all interventions were shared and at each doctors changeover inductions, to reinforce and sustain change.

Results: Preliminary data in January 2023 identified that 0% of patients with non-NOF fractures received secondary prevention and only 7% had bone health mentioned in the discharge summary. The results of teaching alone from May 2023, indicated improved clinician knowledge and confidence, but only modest clinical improvement. However, by December 2023, the combined interventions demonstrated significant progress; 92% of patients had bone health bloods performed, 57% of patients were identified as requiring treatment and 70% of those received appropriate management. Additionally, 82% of patients had bone health mentioned on their discharge summary.

Conclusion: The interventions enhanced the identification of patients requiring further investigation and management, underscoring the importance of a multimodal approach for tangible change. To further solidify these improvements, a checklist was created for medically fit patients and is utilised by the ward manager to guide the daily multidisciplinary board round. Furthermore, an order set within our ICE system was created to streamline requesting bone health blood tests. Whilst the outcomes of these interventions are outstanding and to be collected in May 2024, we anticipate greater improvements in outcomes.

Introduction

Geriatric medicine is inherently complex and requires multi-disciplinary integration. Simulation-based training has been recognised by the Joint Royal Colleges of Physicians’ Training Board and the Royal College of Nursing as a method to enhance learning and improve patient outcomes. This project aimed to develop a multi-professional simulation programme within care of the elderly to mimic the multi-professional clinical practice that takes place on geriatric hospital wards.

Methods

A total of ten half-day simulation sessions have been run across two sites in two years. The scenarios cover frailty, orthogeriatric post-operative complications, acute delirium, Parkinson’s disease, thrombolysis and end of life care. The sessions were attended by 57 participants, including 24 doctors, 20 nurses, 7 nursing students, 4 healthcare assistants and 2 physician associates. Quantitative and qualitative questionnaires conducted pre- and post- simulation were used to assess confidence levels and attitudes towards simulation as a learning tool.

Results

Both pre- and post- simulation, candidates had the most confidence in managing end of life situations, and least confidence in managing acutely unwell patients with Parkinson’s disease. Confidence levels for managing common geriatric scenarios increased by an average of 21% after candidates participated in the simulation session. Thematic analysis highlighted the importance of collaboration within a team to enhance a sense of belonging, and pro-activeness of staff to highlight deteriorating patients to colleagues and family members.

Conclusions

Simulation that mimics the ward environment is an effective tool in increasing the confidence of the multi-disciplinary team looking after geriatric patients through exposing candidates to complex situations and increasing awareness of the roles within the team. The simulation sessions have highlighted clinical areas that require further education within the Trust, such as thrombolysis. Future development of the simulation will aim to adapt the scenarios for use of the wider multidisciplinary team, incorporating therapists and pharmacists.

Introduction

The number of older adults accessing the healthcare service far exceeds the available geriatric specialist services. It is recognised that for the foreseeable future most hospital inpatient contacts with older adults will be completed by doctors not specifically trained in Geriatric Medicine. To ensure the provision of adequate healthcare, it is imperative that all hospital doctors are trained in the minimum Geriatric Medicine competencies. Allowing for the broad, complex, and multidisciplinary nature of Geriatric Medicine, we conducted a group concept mapping (GCM) study to permit multiple stakeholders with various expertise to convey their thoughts on the competencies required by all hospital doctors caring for older adults.

Methods

GCM is a mixed methods approach utilising six phases to generate expert group consensus, enabling participants to organise and represent their ideas. We invited healthcare professionals, patient advocacy groups and clinical educators to participate in GCM via an online platform. Hierarchical cluster analysis and multi-dimensional scaling were utilised to analyse participant input regarding competencies required by doctors caring for older adults.

Results

Twelve competency domains were identified by participants as integral for all hospital doctors to care for older adults. Domains rated most important related to interpersonal communication skills, medicolegal concerns, recognition and management of delirium and medication management.

Discussion

The twelve competency domains indicate the diverse skillset required by all doctors to provide comprehensive care to older adults within a hospital setting. The emergence of interpersonal communication skills underscores the importance of effective- doctor patient and interprofessional communication. Furthermore, the emphasis on medicolegal issues highlights the potential complex ethical and legal aspects in treating older adults. Recognition of delirium and medication management underline the specific challenges associated with caring for this specific population.

Conclusion

This study identifies competencies that may serve as a foundational framework for ensuring quality healthcare for the ageing population. Future initiatives should consider incorporating these competencies to improve inpatient care provided by hospital doctors to older adults.

 Introduction: The ageing population means all doctors, regardless of specialty, will need knowledge, skills, and attitudes to care for older people with complex health conditions. An essential component of preparing the medical workforce to best care for older people is by including teaching on ageing and geriatric medicine in undergraduate medical curricula. Here we present results of the British Geriatrics Society (BGS) national curriculum survey 2021-22, highlighting progress made in undergraduate teaching in geriatric medicine.

Methods: All 35 UK GMC-registered medical schools at the time of data collection were invited to participate in an online survey on content, methodology, timing, and duration of teaching in ageing and geriatric medicine. The survey was structured around the 2013 BGS recommended undergraduate curriculum, for consistency with previous surveys.

Results: 30/35 of UK medical schools responded (83% response rate). Most teaching occurred in the fourth year of study (21/30, 70%). The majority (15/30, 50%) reported a discrete module for geriatric medicine lasting 4-8 weeks, an increase on previous surveys. However, several programmes have reduced the amount of in-person teaching since the COVID-19 pandemic. Notably, three schools reported geriatric medicine exposure lasting >12 weeks. Of these, two were integrated clerkships and one a dedicated geriatric medicine module. There is increasing focus on multidisciplinary education, with emphasis on combining virtual or simulated teaching with other healthcare professions (n=7). Every school (n=30) taught at least one topic as small-group or case-based learning.

Conclusion: There is a trend towards increasing exposure to geriatric medicine compared to previous surveys in 2008 and 2013. However, several of the programmes reporting greater exposure incorporate geriatric medicine in an integrated clerkship rather than as a dedicated module. Programmes demonstrated a move from didactic teaching towards small-group and case-based learning, employing a wider variety of assessment methods than previous.

Introduction

Geriatric syndromes are traditionally taught through didactic teaching and bed side tutorials. However, these do not consider the science of learning and the strategies needed for a novice learner. It is prudent to manage cognitive load, create associations through testing and enforce deliberate practice for a novice as opposed to an advanced learner. Case- Based discussions (CBD) serve as an apt tool to deliver knowledge covering geriatric syndromes; aimed at testing learner's understanding through its application to a simulated patient profile.

This pilot aimed to test the applicability of CBD to teach geriatric syndromes to novice learners.

Method 

A scoping review was completed by medical officers starting on their geriatric medicine rotation in a Singapore tertiary hospital to determine syndromes which they request dedicated teaching for within curriculum. Learners ranked Incontinence and Falls with Osteoporosis management as the top 2 geriatric syndromes of interest. Focus group discussion using Rogers’s theory of diffusion principle was undertaken to understand both the advantages and challenges of CBD. Clinical scenarios were curated specific to the 2 topics with learner's completing a pre session quiz beforehand to determine their baseline knowledge. The topic specific CBD was done via zoom platform with questions applied in a graded fashion; components include that of diagnosis, evaluation, and management of select syndrome. Learners completed a post session quiz 1 week after the CBD to determine retention of knowledge.

Results

Quantitative Feedback received from the learners highlighted that more than 90% would want CBD to be implemented for other geriatric syndromes. There was an improvement in the average score obtained in post session quiz for Osteoporosis from 6.09 to 6.75. However, there was notably poor participation in the post session quiz.

Conclusion

This pilot highlights that CBD should be utilized to enhance teaching of clinical concepts in geriatric medicine.

Background:

Delirium is a common condition in hospitals, especially among older people. This refers to a dramatic decline in mental capabilities marked by diminished concentration and consciousness.

Aims:

The purpose of this study is to assess the views, knowledge, and behavior of non-consultant hospital doctors about managing delirium in a large Irish hospital. Methods: Questionnaires were given to 28 healthcare professionals from various departments according to Davis and MacLullicin (2009). It was conducted between July and September 2023 with emphasis on finding out its prevalence rate, diagnostic criteria, and management strategies for delirium.

Results:

The study established that majority of the respondents recognized the importance of delirium but there appears to be a gap in practical management of this clinical syndrome. Although many doctors agreed that delirium was significant, most lacked confidence in diagnosing as well as managing it. The use of standardized assessment tools like the 4AT was limited.

Conclusions:

This study highlights the disparity between what is known and practiced by hospital doctors concerning delirium care. It implies increased training for delirium management with frequent use of assessment tools and ongoing education aimed at enhancing patients’ outcomes during cases of delirium. Keywords:Delirium Management, Hospital Doctors, Medical Training, 4AT, Clinical Practice, Elderly Care.

Introduction: Many countries are facing an ageing population, and this is also evident in Singapore. To alleviate this matter and to cope with the increasing number of older persons today, nursing homes are also expanding. Residents of nursing homes are often frail and are at higher risk of multiple hospital admissions. On many occasions, the benefit of conveying the frail residents to acute hospitals is unclear and may even cause more harm. We implemented an acute hospital-nursing home collaborative pilot in two nursing homes with an objective to reduce emergency department visit and inpatient hospitalization among nursing home residents. We aim to study the experiences of healthcare personnel who were involved in an acute hospital-nursing homes collaboration in managing acutely ill residents.

Methods: Explorative qualitative interviews were conducted with fifteen nursing staff from two nursing homes involved in the pilot collaboration. The interview transcripts were thematically analyzed.

Results: The study delved into five key thematic areas: knowledge and understanding, service satisfaction, challenges, enablers, and service improvements. It revealed that a significant portion of staff lacked a comprehensive understanding of the collaboration's objectives. Nevertheless, there was a consensus that they found reassurance in the accessibility of hospital providers without immediate activation of emergency services. Nursing home staff acknowledged enhancing their ability to identify residents requiring escalated care through this collaboration. The interventions utilized, such as the NEWS assessment tool, hospital transfer forms, and teleconsultation portal, were noted for their user-friendliness. Challenges encountered included pressure from next-of-kin favouring treatments in acute hospitals over nursing homes and insufficient on-site resources. Identified enablers included a robust support system and the competency and motivation of nursing home staff to enhance residents' care, facilitating collaboration. Recommendations for improvement highlighted the need for training and skill development among nursing staff and workforce enhancement to bolster collaboration adherence.

Conclusion: These key themes highlight the significance of the collaboration between nursing homes and hospitals in improving care for residents, while also acknowledging the challenges and areas for future improvements.

Frailty is defined as a state of increased vulnerability to poor resolution of homoeostasis after a stressor event, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes (1). The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a validated infographic tool used to assess frailty in clinical settings (2). It aims to provide a standardised framework for frailty assessment, however determining the CFS is primarily subjective in nature, relying on clinical judgement and observation. NHS Elect have launched a CFS application, helping to improve the objectiveness of the CFS outcome. A quality improvement project performed at Royal Surrey Foundation Trust explored the difference in the CFS calculated by junior doctors from Non-Geriatric specialties and referred to the Inpatient Older Person Advice and Liaison (iOPAL) team, compared with the CFS calculated by the iOPAL team using the CFS application. The audit showed 27% of referrals had no CFS provided, despite it being a referral criterion, 20% had the same CFS score, 30% had an over scored CFS and 23% had an underscored CFS. The iOPAL team updated the referral form to include advice on how to calculate the CFS and included webpage and QR-code links to access the CFS application. In addition, direct verbal feedback and education was provided. Since the interventions, an improvement of CFS calculations has been seen with a repeat audit showing a reduction of referrals not providing a CFS to 17%, an increase having the same CFS score to 34% and reduction of underscoring CFS to 9%. Over scoring of CFS remained an issue at 40%. In conclusion, education around CFS and use of the CFS application has led to improved CFS scoring by junior doctors from Non-Geriatric specialties. Further micro-learning sessions are being developed to target clinicians of all grades from Non-Geriatric specialties, in particular surgical specialties.

Introduction: On designing and leading the Foundation Year 1 (FY1) Older Person’s Unit (OPU) teaching programme at St Thomas’ Hospital, London (STH), it was identified that the method of feedback collation was inefficient and yielding poor quality feedback from FY1s. Feedback fatigue was high.

Plan:
FY1 trainees were initially asked to complete feedback for their FY1 OPU teaching on paper forms. This yielded a high response rate (100% of forms completed), but feedback quality was poor. The time taken to collate responses from the paper feedback forms was disproportionate to the quality of feedback received.

Intervention 1: An online feedback form was designed and emailed to the FY1 trainees after each teaching session. This collated responses automatically into a password protected Excel spreadsheet.

Study:
The online feedback form initially yielded a high response rate, along with constructive feedback. Time taken to collate responses was reduced to zero. However, was noted that the response rate fell gradually to approximately 20%. The two main factors inhibiting responses were a heavy email burden and forgetting to fill in the feedback form.

Intervention 2: A QR code linked to the online feedback form was designed, with the intention of being shown at the end of each teaching session. This was emailed out to all presenters in advance and incorporated into their teaching presentations.

Study:
Feedback response rate attained 100% consistently over a 2 month period. The feedback quality received was higher, with constructive comments being fed back in a timely matter.

Conclusion: Timely recognition of feedback fatigue in the FY1 trainee cohort is extremely important. Designing and implementing methods by which to negate and overcome this is important in obtaining feedback such that future teaching sessions can be continually improved and tailored to FY1 learning needs.