Delirium Assessments in an Acute Frailty ward: An Audit of Current Practice

Abstract ID
3225
Authors' names
C Bateman-Champain; D Rasasingam; A Banerjee; K Jayakumar ; S Smith; S Lee; J Thevathasan; C Taylor; J Hetherington; M Saad; K Joshi; A Shipley; F Dernie.
Author's provenances
St George's University Hospital NHS foundation trust
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Introduction Delirium is a common, reversible condition with significant morbidity. Guidelines facilitate diagnosis and management (NICE Delirium Guidelines [CG103]). Previous audits in an acute frailty ward identified areas for improvement in assessment of delirium. In this cycle, a novel admission proforma was implemented to promote adherence to current guidelines. Methods This is a continuation of a previous quality improvement project representing cycles three and four. An admission proforma was co-developed with patients and the multidisciplinary team (MDT), primarily to prompt staff to complete delirium assessments. Adherence was audited and the proforma was modified based on feedback. An equivalent audit was then conducted on the updated proforma. The audit period occurred over several resident doctor changeovers. Primary outcomes; completion of delirium assessments, positive diagnosis of delirium and use of the new proforma. Secondary outcomes; completion of resuscitation and clinical frailty score (CFS) forms and the relationship between length of stay (LOS) and delirium or CFS. Results  The initial admission proforma was used in 86% of admissions. After its introduction, 53% of patients had completed delirium assessments and the prevalence of delirium was 25%. Resuscitation forms were completed in 86% of patients, 60% of patients had completed CFS. Diagnoses of delirium were associated with increased LOS. CFS of 6/7 was associated with an increased LOS and a diagnosis of delirium. The modified proforma was used in 94% of admissions. Completion of delirium assessments improved to 79% and diagnoses of delirium to 43%. Completion of resuscitation forms and CFS improved to 93% and 79% respectively. The difference in LOS between patients with and without delirium was statistically significant. Conclusion This study shows the efficacy of an admission proforma, as low-cost MDT-based intervention, improving and sustaining adherence to guidelines and improving documentation and assessment of other elements of a comprehensive geriatric assessment.